🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard females from violence, covering family violence, following extensive and intense discussions in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in the capital this past week to oppose the decision. The final authority now lies with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to establish laws and support services to eliminate all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to initiate the process of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a move that rights groups characterized as a major setback for gender equality.

Political Debate and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its emphasis on equal rights undermines traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a move sponsored by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the primary parties advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent vote has provoked widespread outcry both within Latvia and abroad.

22,000 people have endorsed a national appeal calling for the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has called a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice fueled by false information. He described it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since Turkey left the convention four years ago, instances of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds support, the president could possibly send back the legislation for further review if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to constitutional principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in our nation but across the continent," stated a rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple EU nations
• The European treaty mandates specific safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect similar discussions in additional EU countries